Partners

Autonomy is a supply chain, not a product

The machine builder, the integrator, the chemistry supplier and the buyer all have to agree before a mill changes how it runs. We build with all four.

  • OEM connectors
  • Certified integrators
  • Buyer evidence standards

Partner types

Six ways to work with us

Machine builders

Loom, knitting, jet and stenter OEMs embedding Yarneon control alongside their own HMIs.

Co-engineering, certified connectors, joint field support.

Discuss a partnership →

Systems integrators

Automation integrators deploying mill-edge appliances, cameras and robotics on the floor.

Deployment certification, margin on hardware and services.

Discuss a partnership →

Colour & lab vendors

Spectrophotometer and colour-library vendors whose data makes recipe prediction sharper.

Bidirectional colour sync, joint lab-dip workflows.

Discuss a partnership →

Compute & silicon

NVIDIA Inception and accelerated-computing partners for edge, training and simulation.

Reference architectures, early hardware access.

Discuss a partnership →

Sustainability programmes

ZDHC, Higg and OEKO-TEX aligned programmes consuming Yarneon utility and chemistry data.

Automated evidence, verified reporting.

Discuss a partnership →

Buyers & brands

Apparel and home brands who want the conformance record their mills cannot produce today.

Supplier scorecards, shade-family intelligence.

Discuss a partnership →

Accelerated computing

Physical AI needs real compute, at the machine

Line-speed vision, spectral colour science and a fabric-line twin are GPU-essential workloads. Yarneon runs them at the mill edge and trains them centrally.

The accelerated-computing stack behind the mill loop
ComponentRole in the mill
Isaac + JetsonRobotic roll, beam and doffing handling, plus mill-edge inference on inspection and control cells.
Metropolis / DeepStream + TensorRTLine-speed fabric-defect vision pipelines targeting sub-100 ms per-frame decisions. ASPIRATIONAL
HoloscanSensor fusion across cameras, spectrophotometers, probes, PLC events and meters into one explainable state stream.
Omniverse + Replicator / CosmosThe as-produced fabric twin, and synthetic generation of rare defect, barré and shade-variation cases.
cuOptDye-lot sequencing, rework queues, machine assignment and water/energy allocation under hard constraints.
Triton + NIM + NeMoMulti-model serving at the mill edge, plus grounded textile-process and colour reasoning with citations.
NVIDIA AI EnterprisePrivate and on-prem deployment for groups protecting dye recipes and construction IP.

Items marked ASPIRATIONAL describe target architecture ahead of full production validation.

Integrations

It speaks to the machines you already own

Yarneon is not a rip-and-replace. It connects to the looms, frames, jets, stenters, cameras, spectrophotometers and MES already on your floor.

Loom & knit controllers

Picanol, Toyota, Tsudakoma, Karl Mayer and Mayer & Cie controllers over OPC UA and vendor PLC tags.

Spinning frames

Rieter, Trützschler, Saurer and Murata frames, draft, twist, speed and end-break telemetry.

Dyeing & finishing

Thies, Fongs, Brazzoli jets and Monforts/Brückner stenters via PLC, recipe systems and dosing units.

Colour & lab

Datacolor and X-Rite spectrophotometers, colour libraries, Pantone TCX standards and lab-dip workflows.

Inspection hardware

Line-scan RGB and NIR cameras, Uster and Elbit inspection frames, existing light boxes.

MES / ERP

SAP, Datatex, TIM, Coats Digital and homegrown mill MES over REST, files and database CDC.

Utilities & sustainability

Water, steam and electricity meters; ZDHC Gateway, Higg FEM and OEKO-TEX reporting.

Robotics

Vision-guided manipulators and AMRs on NVIDIA Isaac and Jetson for doffing, beams and roll transport.

Vendor names are listed for compatibility reference only and do not imply endorsement or partnership.

Programme

What partners get

Technical

Certified connectors

Reference connector implementations, conformance tests and joint field validation on real lines.

Commercial

Referral and resale

Margin on resale, referral fees on sourced deals and joint account planning in shared territories.

Enablement

Engineer training

Two-day certification covering deployment, safety model, runbooks and escalation.

Support

Named escalation

A named Yarneon engineer per partner, with an agreed escalation path during commissioning.

Co-marketing

Joint material

Case studies, joint webinars and trade-show presence where results warrant it.

Roadmap

Early access

Preview builds and quarterly roadmap sessions for partners with live deployments.

Agent graph

One run, ten steps, one human decision

This is the shape of a dye lot on Yarneon, shown as an illustrative scenario rather than a customer run. Ingest and simulation fan out, converge on a colourist approval gate, then dosing, verification, finishing, inspection and release. The accent traces the active path; every node opens in the inspector.

RUN-4471 10 steps · 1 approval gate · 1 recovered failure · illustrative scenario COMPLETE
ingest conformance twin simulate recipe dye + colour approve human gate dose bath control shade verify ΔE finish stenter inspect vision rework replan grade release

Scroll the graph sideways · or open the text equivalent below

SUCCEEDED APPROVAL FAILED RUNNING
Text equivalent, workflow steps, dependencies and status
Run RUN-4471 workflow graph, as a table
StepStageDepends on StatusDuration
ingestconformancenone SUCCEEDED0.8s
twinsimulateingest SUCCEEDED46s
recipedye + colouringest SUCCEEDED2.4s
approvehuman gatetwin, recipe APPROVAL4m 12s
dosebath controlapprove SUCCEEDED118m
shadeverify ΔEdose SUCCEEDED9.1s
finishstenterdose SUCCEEDED64m
inspectvisionshade, finish FAILED38m
reworkreplaninspect SUCCEEDED1.6s
gradereleaserework SUCCEEDED3.0s
  • Parallel branches2twin simulation and recipe prediction run together
  • Human gates1colourist approval, 15 minutes, attributed
  • Failures recovered1weft streak on roll 09, replanned in-run

Run timeline

RUN-4471 · Indigo poplin, 3,180 kg, due Thursday

The same scenario run as an ordered timeline: step, status, duration and the tool result behind it. Inspection failed on one roll, the run recovered, replanned the cut and still held the ship date.

RUN-4471 RUN COMPLETE Scenario mill · reactive exhaust jet dyeing · illustrative run, not a customer deployment

Goal: Dye lot DL-4471 · 3,180 kg · 40s combed cotton poplin · shade Indigo 19-4028 TCX · ΔE ≤ 0.8 · due Thu 06:00

  1. 01 ingest.lot_state SUCCEEDED 0.8s

    Pulls greige genealogy for 14 rolls: yarn lots, loom, greige GSM 138, absorbency and residual size from the prep line.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Quality-and-Conformance
    result  ← 14 rolls · 3,180 kg · mean GSM 138.2 (σ 1.1) · prep OK
  2. 02 twin.simulate_lot SUCCEEDED 46s

    Omniverse fabric-line twin simulates the exhaust curve, machine loading and takt for three candidate recipes before a drop of dye is used.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Yield-and-Takt
    result  ← 3 candidates scored · best predicted ΔE 0.52 · 118 min cycle
  3. 03 dye.predict_recipe SUCCEEDED 2.4s

    Spectral recipe model proposes a 3-dye combination against the buyer standard, corrected for this substrate’s absorbency and the current water hardness.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  ← 2.14% Navy RGB · 0.61% Blue BRF · 0.08% Black B · salt 62 g/L
  4. 04 human.approve_recipe APPROVAL 4m 12s

    Recipe deviates >5% from the standing card, so autonomy is capped: the colourist approves, rejects or edits before any dosing. Guardrail policy MILL-02/DYE-APPROVAL.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  → awaiting colourist · approved on shift 04:18
  5. 05 dye.control_bath SUCCEEDED 118m

    Closed-loop dosing and ramp control against live bath spectrophotometry; two mid-cycle corrections applied when exhaustion ran 4% ahead of model.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Dye-and-Color
    result  ← exhaust 96.4% · 2 corrections · bath ΔE 0.41 at drain
  6. 06 shade.verify_lot SUCCEEDED 9.1s

    Per-roll spectral read against Indigo 19-4028 TCX under D65/TL84/A; metamerism scored and rolls sorted into shade bands.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Shade-and-Quality
    result  ← mean ΔE 0.58 · 13 rolls band A · 1 roll band B
  7. 07 finish.control_stenter SUCCEEDED 64m

    Stenter chemistry, overfeed and curing profile set to hold hand, 148 cm width and residual shrinkage under 3%.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Finish-and-Hand
    result  ← width 148.3 cm · shrink 2.1% warp / 1.4% weft
  8. 08 inspect.scan_rolls FAILED 38m

    In-line vision flags a recurring 6 cm weft streak on roll 09 between 412 m and 445 m, traced to a stenter pin-chain slip, not a dye fault.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Defect-and-Inspect
    result  ← 1 defect cluster · roll 09 · 33 m affected · class WEFT_STREAK
  9. 09 plan.rework_route SUCCEEDED 1.6s

    cuOpt re-plans the cut and rework route: 33 m diverted to seconds, remaining 14,890 m re-sequenced so the buyer’s Thursday ship date still holds.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Yield-and-Takt
    result  ← 33 m to seconds (0.22%) · ship date held
  10. 10 quality.grade_and_release SUCCEEDED 3.0s

    Four-point grading, roll genealogy and the conformance packet (AATCC 61, ISO 105-C06, ZDHC MRSL declaration) are assembled and released to the buyer portal.

    Agent, input and output
    agent   Quality-and-Conformance
    result  ← 13 rolls Grade A · 1 roll Grade B · packet signed
RUN OUTCOME

Lot released first time, on shade, on date.

Result of run RUN-4471
MeasureValueContext
Final mean ΔE0.58against a 0.80 tolerance
Re-dyes avoided1the standing card would have missed shade
Seconds0.22%versus the scenario mill baseline of 1.9%
Water used46 L/kgversus 59 L/kg on the scenario recipe card
Human decisions1the recipe approval gate

Why this matters

A mill does not fail on the good lots. It fails on the lot where the substrate drifted, the recipe card was wrong, and nobody found out until the buyer opened the carton. Yarneon makes that lot legible while it is still in the machine.

Trust signals

What the runs actually produce

No customer results are published yet. These are platform facts and plan terms from our own documents. Outcomes will be measured against each mill’s own trailing twelve months, in shadow mode before anything is controlled.

9

Mill agents, one per stage, from spinning to release.

6

Products in the loop: Vireon, Spindra, Loomix, Shadeon, Doffex and Twinly.

3 to 5

Design partners we are onboarding first, one wedge workflow each.

$14k

Per line per month on the Line plan. Mill and Enterprise sit above it.

Items marked ASPIRATIONAL are design targets ahead of production validation.

Design-partner programme

What a design partnership involves

Three to five mills, one wedge workflow each, shadow mode first. The sequence comes from our MVP plan and does not change for anyone.

  1. Phase 1

    Instrument

    The wedge workflow is connected in shadow mode and the baseline for seconds, re-dyes and waste is measured from the mill’s own data.

  2. Phase 2

    Assist

    The agent recommends yarn, construction and recipe moves and predicts defects and shade. An engineer approves each one, and accuracy is scored in the open.

  3. Phase 3

    Graduate

    Low-risk inspection, dye and finishing loops move to bounded auto-control one setpoint at a time. Exceptions escalate to a named person.

  4. Phase 4

    Expand

    Adjacent modules are added within the same mill once the wedge holds its numbers. Publication of results is the mill’s decision.

Guardrails

An agent earns the right to touch a machine

Nothing here is a global "AI on" switch. Autonomy is granted per setpoint, bounded by policy, reversible by any operator and logged permanently.

Graduated autonomy
Every workflow moves observe → assist → bounded auto-control. Autonomy ceilings are per-setpoint policy, not a global switch.
Human-in-the-loop gates
Approval gates fire on deviation thresholds, new substrates, or any action outside the authorised envelope. Approvals are attributed and time-stamped.
Reversibility
Every control action ships with a revert path and a last-known-good setpoint. Operators can take manual control at any moment, from the HMI or the panel.
Immutable audit log
Assurance-grade, append-only record of every observation, decision, tool call, approval and actuation, exportable for buyer and regulatory audit.
Tenant isolation
Recipes, construction libraries and roll data are isolated per tenant. No cross-tenant training. Permission-aware retrieval with enforced citations.
Sandboxed tools
Agents call machines through a typed, scoped tool layer with rate and range limits. There is no path from a model output to an unbounded PLC write.

Enterprise

Built for groups, not just for one dyehouse

Multi-site rollout, group benchmarking, governance that a CIO recognises, and deployment options for producers who will never put a dye recipe in someone else’s cloud.

Governance a textile group can actually sign

Approval policies, spend limits, autonomy ceilings and audit exports are configured per site and enforced centrally. Group leadership sees which mill holds shade best on which family, and the mills see why.

  • SSO (SAML/OIDC), SCIM provisioning and RBAC down to the setpoint
  • Per-site data residency, private VPC or fully on-prem deployment
  • Group benchmarking across right-first-time, seconds, water and energy
  • Signed SLAs, named mill engineers and quarterly outcome reviews
  • Outcome-based commercial components on yield, re-dyes and utilities

Group view

One group, one standard

Right-first-time shade by site and shade family, normalised for substrate mix, so a fair comparison is possible for the first time.

Rollout

Shadow first

Wedge line in shadow, then assist, then control.

Autonomy

Per setpoint

Granted one at a time.

Deployment

From first connector to bounded control, one phase at a time

No mill hands over a jet on day one. The path is deliberately slow at the start and faster once the numbers hold. Durations are quoted after the assessment, because they depend on how instrumented the mill already is.

  1. Phase 1

    Connect

    Mill survey, edge appliance install, connectors to machines, MES and meters. Telemetry starts flowing; nothing is controlled.

  2. Phase 2

    Observe

    Models run in shadow against live production. Predictions are scored against what the mill actually produced, on your data.

  3. Phase 3

    Assist

    The agent proposes; a human commits. Approval gates, setpoint envelopes and revert paths are agreed with the process owners.

  4. Phase 4

    Control

    Bounded auto-control on the setpoints you authorise, one at a time, with autonomy ceilings that you can lower at any moment.

Questions

What mills ask before they let an agent near a jet

Both, in that order. Every workflow starts in observe mode, graduates to assist (the agent proposes, a human commits), and only then to bounded auto-control on the specific setpoints you authorise. Autonomy ceilings, approval gates and spend limits are policy objects you own, and every action is reversible and logged.

Bring Yarneon to your customers

If you commission dyehouses, sell looms or integrate MES in textiles, there is a clean partnership shape here.

Book a mill assessment