Machine builders
Loom, knitting, jet and stenter OEMs embedding Yarneon control alongside their own HMIs.
Partners
The machine builder, the integrator, the chemistry supplier and the buyer all have to agree before a mill changes how it runs. We build with all four.
Partner types
Loom, knitting, jet and stenter OEMs embedding Yarneon control alongside their own HMIs.
Automation integrators deploying mill-edge appliances, cameras and robotics on the floor.
Spectrophotometer and colour-library vendors whose data makes recipe prediction sharper.
NVIDIA Inception and accelerated-computing partners for edge, training and simulation.
ZDHC, Higg and OEKO-TEX aligned programmes consuming Yarneon utility and chemistry data.
Apparel and home brands who want the conformance record their mills cannot produce today.
Accelerated computing
Line-speed vision, spectral colour science and a fabric-line twin are GPU-essential workloads. Yarneon runs them at the mill edge and trains them centrally.
| Component | Role in the mill |
|---|---|
| Isaac + Jetson | Robotic roll, beam and doffing handling, plus mill-edge inference on inspection and control cells. |
| Metropolis / DeepStream + TensorRT | Line-speed fabric-defect vision pipelines targeting sub-100 ms per-frame decisions. ASPIRATIONAL |
| Holoscan | Sensor fusion across cameras, spectrophotometers, probes, PLC events and meters into one explainable state stream. |
| Omniverse + Replicator / Cosmos | The as-produced fabric twin, and synthetic generation of rare defect, barré and shade-variation cases. |
| cuOpt | Dye-lot sequencing, rework queues, machine assignment and water/energy allocation under hard constraints. |
| Triton + NIM + NeMo | Multi-model serving at the mill edge, plus grounded textile-process and colour reasoning with citations. |
| NVIDIA AI Enterprise | Private and on-prem deployment for groups protecting dye recipes and construction IP. |
Items marked ASPIRATIONAL describe target architecture ahead of full production validation.
Integrations
Yarneon is not a rip-and-replace. It connects to the looms, frames, jets, stenters, cameras, spectrophotometers and MES already on your floor.
Picanol, Toyota, Tsudakoma, Karl Mayer and Mayer & Cie controllers over OPC UA and vendor PLC tags.
Rieter, Trützschler, Saurer and Murata frames, draft, twist, speed and end-break telemetry.
Thies, Fongs, Brazzoli jets and Monforts/Brückner stenters via PLC, recipe systems and dosing units.
Datacolor and X-Rite spectrophotometers, colour libraries, Pantone TCX standards and lab-dip workflows.
Line-scan RGB and NIR cameras, Uster and Elbit inspection frames, existing light boxes.
SAP, Datatex, TIM, Coats Digital and homegrown mill MES over REST, files and database CDC.
Water, steam and electricity meters; ZDHC Gateway, Higg FEM and OEKO-TEX reporting.
Vision-guided manipulators and AMRs on NVIDIA Isaac and Jetson for doffing, beams and roll transport.
Vendor names are listed for compatibility reference only and do not imply endorsement or partnership.
Programme
Technical
Reference connector implementations, conformance tests and joint field validation on real lines.
Commercial
Margin on resale, referral fees on sourced deals and joint account planning in shared territories.
Enablement
Two-day certification covering deployment, safety model, runbooks and escalation.
Support
A named Yarneon engineer per partner, with an agreed escalation path during commissioning.
Co-marketing
Case studies, joint webinars and trade-show presence where results warrant it.
Roadmap
Preview builds and quarterly roadmap sessions for partners with live deployments.
Agent graph
This is the shape of a dye lot on Yarneon, shown as an illustrative scenario rather than a customer run. Ingest and simulation fan out, converge on a colourist approval gate, then dosing, verification, finishing, inspection and release. The accent traces the active path; every node opens in the inspector.
Scroll the graph sideways · or open the text equivalent below
| Step | Stage | Depends on | Status | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ingest | conformance | none | SUCCEEDED | 0.8s |
| twin | simulate | ingest | SUCCEEDED | 46s |
| recipe | dye + colour | ingest | SUCCEEDED | 2.4s |
| approve | human gate | twin, recipe | APPROVAL | 4m 12s |
| dose | bath control | approve | SUCCEEDED | 118m |
| shade | verify ΔE | dose | SUCCEEDED | 9.1s |
| finish | stenter | dose | SUCCEEDED | 64m |
| inspect | vision | shade, finish | FAILED | 38m |
| rework | replan | inspect | SUCCEEDED | 1.6s |
| grade | release | rework | SUCCEEDED | 3.0s |
Run timeline
The same scenario run as an ordered timeline: step, status, duration and the tool result behind it. Inspection failed on one roll, the run recovered, replanned the cut and still held the ship date.
Goal: Dye lot DL-4471 · 3,180 kg · 40s combed cotton poplin · shade Indigo 19-4028 TCX · ΔE ≤ 0.8 · due Thu 06:00
Pulls greige genealogy for 14 rolls: yarn lots, loom, greige GSM 138, absorbency and residual size from the prep line.
agent Quality-and-Conformance
result ← 14 rolls · 3,180 kg · mean GSM 138.2 (σ 1.1) · prep OK
Omniverse fabric-line twin simulates the exhaust curve, machine loading and takt for three candidate recipes before a drop of dye is used.
agent Yield-and-Takt
result ← 3 candidates scored · best predicted ΔE 0.52 · 118 min cycle
Spectral recipe model proposes a 3-dye combination against the buyer standard, corrected for this substrate’s absorbency and the current water hardness.
agent Dye-and-Color
result ← 2.14% Navy RGB · 0.61% Blue BRF · 0.08% Black B · salt 62 g/L
Recipe deviates >5% from the standing card, so autonomy is capped: the colourist approves, rejects or edits before any dosing. Guardrail policy MILL-02/DYE-APPROVAL.
agent Dye-and-Color
result → awaiting colourist · approved on shift 04:18
Closed-loop dosing and ramp control against live bath spectrophotometry; two mid-cycle corrections applied when exhaustion ran 4% ahead of model.
agent Dye-and-Color
result ← exhaust 96.4% · 2 corrections · bath ΔE 0.41 at drain
Per-roll spectral read against Indigo 19-4028 TCX under D65/TL84/A; metamerism scored and rolls sorted into shade bands.
agent Shade-and-Quality
result ← mean ΔE 0.58 · 13 rolls band A · 1 roll band B
Stenter chemistry, overfeed and curing profile set to hold hand, 148 cm width and residual shrinkage under 3%.
agent Finish-and-Hand
result ← width 148.3 cm · shrink 2.1% warp / 1.4% weft
In-line vision flags a recurring 6 cm weft streak on roll 09 between 412 m and 445 m, traced to a stenter pin-chain slip, not a dye fault.
agent Defect-and-Inspect
result ← 1 defect cluster · roll 09 · 33 m affected · class WEFT_STREAK
cuOpt re-plans the cut and rework route: 33 m diverted to seconds, remaining 14,890 m re-sequenced so the buyer’s Thursday ship date still holds.
agent Yield-and-Takt
result ← 33 m to seconds (0.22%) · ship date held
Four-point grading, roll genealogy and the conformance packet (AATCC 61, ISO 105-C06, ZDHC MRSL declaration) are assembled and released to the buyer portal.
agent Quality-and-Conformance
result ← 13 rolls Grade A · 1 roll Grade B · packet signed
| Measure | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Final mean ΔE | 0.58 | against a 0.80 tolerance |
| Re-dyes avoided | 1 | the standing card would have missed shade |
| Seconds | 0.22% | versus the scenario mill baseline of 1.9% |
| Water used | 46 L/kg | versus 59 L/kg on the scenario recipe card |
| Human decisions | 1 | the recipe approval gate |
Why this matters
A mill does not fail on the good lots. It fails on the lot where the substrate drifted, the recipe card was wrong, and nobody found out until the buyer opened the carton. Yarneon makes that lot legible while it is still in the machine.
Trust signals
No customer results are published yet. These are platform facts and plan terms from our own documents. Outcomes will be measured against each mill’s own trailing twelve months, in shadow mode before anything is controlled.
Mill agents, one per stage, from spinning to release.
Products in the loop: Vireon, Spindra, Loomix, Shadeon, Doffex and Twinly.
Design partners we are onboarding first, one wedge workflow each.
Per line per month on the Line plan. Mill and Enterprise sit above it.
Items marked ASPIRATIONAL are design targets ahead of production validation.
Design-partner programme
Three to five mills, one wedge workflow each, shadow mode first. The sequence comes from our MVP plan and does not change for anyone.
Phase 1
The wedge workflow is connected in shadow mode and the baseline for seconds, re-dyes and waste is measured from the mill’s own data.
Phase 2
The agent recommends yarn, construction and recipe moves and predicts defects and shade. An engineer approves each one, and accuracy is scored in the open.
Phase 3
Low-risk inspection, dye and finishing loops move to bounded auto-control one setpoint at a time. Exceptions escalate to a named person.
Phase 4
Adjacent modules are added within the same mill once the wedge holds its numbers. Publication of results is the mill’s decision.
Guardrails
Nothing here is a global "AI on" switch. Autonomy is granted per setpoint, bounded by policy, reversible by any operator and logged permanently.
Enterprise
Multi-site rollout, group benchmarking, governance that a CIO recognises, and deployment options for producers who will never put a dye recipe in someone else’s cloud.
Approval policies, spend limits, autonomy ceilings and audit exports are configured per site and enforced centrally. Group leadership sees which mill holds shade best on which family, and the mills see why.
Group view
Right-first-time shade by site and shade family, normalised for substrate mix, so a fair comparison is possible for the first time.
Rollout
Wedge line in shadow, then assist, then control.
Autonomy
Granted one at a time.
Deployment
No mill hands over a jet on day one. The path is deliberately slow at the start and faster once the numbers hold. Durations are quoted after the assessment, because they depend on how instrumented the mill already is.
Phase 1
Mill survey, edge appliance install, connectors to machines, MES and meters. Telemetry starts flowing; nothing is controlled.
Phase 2
Models run in shadow against live production. Predictions are scored against what the mill actually produced, on your data.
Phase 3
The agent proposes; a human commits. Approval gates, setpoint envelopes and revert paths are agreed with the process owners.
Phase 4
Bounded auto-control on the setpoints you authorise, one at a time, with autonomy ceilings that you can lower at any moment.
Questions
If you commission dyehouses, sell looms or integrate MES in textiles, there is a clean partnership shape here.